Employee Determination in Times of Alter: Management Journal

 Employee Determination in Times of Alter: Management Log Essay

Employee Commitment in Times of Change:

Assessing the Importance of Attitudes Toward

Organizational ChangeвЂ

Steven M. Elias*

Office of Psychology, Auburn University or college Montgomery, Montgomery, AL Organizations are powerful and changing entities. Parameters associated with organizational change have been shown to act as mediators of several specific difference variable/workrelated outcome interactions. This study examines three potential antecedents of 258 police officers' attitudes toward organizational transform (ATOC), and whether ATOC mediates the relationships between these antecedents and affective organizational commitment (AOC). During data collection, the officers' police section was reorganization, rearrangement, reshuffling its company design. Structural equation building indicates the expansion need strength/AOC relationship can be fully mediated, whereas the focus of control/AOC and internal work motivation/AOC relationships will be partially mediated by ATOC. Implications and directions for future research are talked about. Keywords: perceptions toward transform; organizational modify; organizational determination The body of materials dedicated to the understanding of company change is definitely impressive, and given that businesses continue to make alterations and changes at amazing rates, were sure to find much more study in this area. Popular is the fact that until lately much of the exploration focusing on concerns relevant to organizational change has focused on organizational-level concerns rather than individual-level worries (Judge, Thoresen, Pucik, you

†The publisher gratefully acknowledges the thoughtful comments of Russell Cropanzano and the manuscript's anonymous gurus.

*Corresponding Writer: Tel.: 334-244-3349; Fax: 334-244-3826 E-mail: [email protected] aum. edu

Journal of Management, Volume. XX Number X, Month XXXX xx-xx

DOI: 10. 1177/0149206307308910

В© 2007 The southern area of Management Relationship. All legal rights reserved. Diary of Managing OnlineFirst, published on October 26, 3 years ago as doi: 10. 1177/0149206307308910 Copyright 3 years ago by The southern part of Management Association.

& Welbourne, 1999; Vakola, Tsaousis, & Nikolaou, 2003; Wanberg & Banas, 2000). Indeed, in the four content articles dedicated to company change which may have appeared inside the Journal of Management's Every year Review series (Armenakis & Bedeian, 1999; Pasmore & Fagans, 1992; Sashkin & Burke, 1987; Woodman, 1989), each offers placed somewhat greater focus on macro-, instead of microlevel, problems. Although it applies that experts have made developments in the understanding of microlevel problems, there is continue to much to become learned. For example , though we have gained several insight into how organizational alter affects organizational commitment, we are still lacking in information with regards to how these types of variables might function jointly (Fedor, Caldwell, & Herold, 2006). Yet , because organizational change serves as an antecedent of organizational commitment, and commitment is very important to company functioning, even more research in this field is warranted (Coleman, Irving, & Cooper, 1999). Of great importance is the fact organizational alter strains not simply the organization overall but likewise individual staff within the corporation (Vakola & Nikolaou, 2005). In fact , in the event that an organization is to successfully put into action change, an alteration strategy should be developed that takes the employees' internal processes into account. A failure to take such techniques into account will likely result in the alter initiative faltering (Deloitte & Touche, 2005). Furthermore, putting into action a change motivation without attending to such techniques can result in personnel experiencing pressure and cynicism, each of which has the probability of reduce organizational commitment, task satisfaction, trust in the organization, and motivation (Reichers, Wanous, & Austin, 1997; Rush, Schoel, & Barnard, 1995; Schweiger & DeNisi, 1991).

Now, the key problem becomes, " What emotional processes should...

References: Allen, N. T., & Meyer, J. S. 1996. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the business: An assessment

of build validity

Amabile, T. Meters., Hill, T. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. 1994. The task Preference Products on hand: Assessing

intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations

Antoni, C. H. 2004. Research be aware: A motivational perspective on modify processes and outcomes. Euro

Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13: 197-216.

Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. 1999. Company change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s.

Souverain, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator adjustable distinction in social mental research:

Conceptual, strategic and statistical things to consider

Bentler, S. M., & Bonett, G. G. 80. Significance testing and goodness-of-fit in the evaluation of covariance structures.

Chen, G., Goddard, T. G., & Casper, W. M. 2004. Examination of the relationships among standard and work-specific

self-evaluations, work-related control philosophy, and job attitudes

Chou, C. L., & Bentler, P. M. 1995. Estimates and tests in structural equation building. In Ur. H. Hoyle (Ed. ),

Structural equation modeling: Ideas issues and applications: 37-55

Deci, Electronic. L., & Moller, A. C. 2005. The concept of skills: A starting place for understanding intrinsic inspiration

and self-determined extrinsic motivation

Deloitte & Touche. 2005. Managing change. http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/article/0,1002,cid%253D96213,00.html,

August 29, 06\.

Dunham, R. B., Loch, J. A., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. D., & Pierce, J. M. 1989. The introduction of an attitude

toward change tool

Eby, T. T., Freeman, D. M., Rush, Meters. C., & Lance, C. E. 1999. Motivational facets of efficient organizational commitment:

A partial evaluation of an integrated theoretical version

Eccles, M. S. june 2006. Subjective process value and the Eccles et al. type of achievement-related options. In A. T. Elliot

& C

Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, T., & Herold, D. Meters. 2006. The consequences of organizational adjustments on staff commitment:

A multilevel analysis

Fok, T. Y., Hartman, S. L., Patti, A. L., & Razek, J. R. 1999. The relationship among equity awareness, growth require

strength, organizational citizenship behavior, and recognized outcomes inside the quality environment: A study of

Graen, G. B., Scandura, T. A., & Graen, M. L. 1986. A field experimental test of the moderating effects of growth

need strength on efficiency

Hackman, L. R., & Oldham, G. R. 1980. Work renovate. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Hatcher, L. 1994. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for aspect analysis and structural equation modeling.

Holmbeck, G. D. 2002. Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric


Houkes, My spouse and i., Janssen, G. P. Meters., de Jonge, J., & Nijhuis, F. J. In. 2001. Job and individual determinants of intrinsic

operate motivation, emotional exhaustion, and turnover intentions: A multi-sample analysis

Hoyle, R. They would., & Panter, A. Capital t. 1995. Talking about structural formula models. In R. They would. Hoyle (Ed. ), Strength equation

modeling: Concepts concerns and applications: 158-176

David, L. L., & Omfattande, J. Meters. 1984. Mediators, moderators, and test to get mediation. Log of Used Psychology,

69: 307-321.

Adam, L. R., Mulaik, S i9000. A., & Brett, L. M. 06\. A tale of two strategies. Organizational Study Methods, 9:


Jöreskog, K. G. 1993. Assessment structural formula models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds. ), Testing structural

equation models: 294-316

Judge, Capital t. A., Erez, A., Recibo, J. Electronic., & Thoresen, C. L. 2003. The Core Self-Evaluations Scale: Development of a measure.

Judge, Capital t. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. 98. Dispositional effects on job and your life satisfaction:

The role of core evaluations

Judge, To. A., Thoresen, C. M., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T. M. 1999. Bureaucratic coping with organizational change:

A dispositional perspective

Kline, 3rd there’s r. B. 1998. Principles and practice of structural formula modeling. New York: Guilford.

Kline, R. B. 2005. Concepts and practice of strength equation modeling (2nd ed. ). New york city: Guilford.

Kouzes, J. Meters., & Posner, B. Unces. 2002. The leadership concern (3rd ed. ). S . fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lau, C. M., & Woodman, R. Watts. 1995. Understanding organizational modify: A schematic perspective. Schools of

Managing Journal, 38: 537-554.

Lines, R. june 2006. The framework and function of attitudes toward organizational alter. Human Resource

Development Review, four: 8-32.

Mathieu, J. Elizabeth., & Zajac, D. Meters. 1990. A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences

of organizational commitment

Metcalfe, W., & Dick, G. 2000. Is the power still along? Measuring law enforcement officials commitment. Diary of Bureaucratic

Psychology, 12-15: 812-832.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. T. 1991. A three-component conceptualization of company commitment. Human being

Resource Management Review, 1: 61-89.

She, J. P., & Allen, N. L. 1997. Determination in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousands of Oaks,

CA: Sage.

She, J. S., Stanley, Deb. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. 2002. Affective, continuance, and normative dedication

to the corporation: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences

Mowday, R. T., Porter, M. W., & Steers, R. M. 1982. Employee-organization entrave: The psychology of commitment,

absenteeism, and turnover

Pasmore, W., & Fagans, M. 1992. Participation, individual expansion, and company change: An assessment and


Piderit, S. K. 2k. Rethinking amount of resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional look at of perceptions

toward an organizational modify

Podsakoff, G. M., MacKenzie, S. M., Lee, T. Y., & Podsakoff, In. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral

exploration: A critical review of the books and advised remedies

Porras, J. I actually., & Robertson, P. J. 1992. Organizational development: Theory, practice, and research. In M. Deb.

Preacher, T. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. 06\. Calculation pertaining to the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation


Reichers, A., Wanous, L., & Austin tx, J. 1997. Understanding and managing cynicism about company change.

The Test written by Njabulo Ndebele and the New York Moments 2005 Globe Cup Sports activities Report. Article