Miss 16.08.2019
 Miss Essay

Suggested Composition Structure

Name: Give your piece of content a name.

Introduction: Supply the reader way. What is your purpose for this piece of content? Introduce the investigation article. (200-300).

Main Body: You must also present your choice of important appraisal framework and provide a rationale. Your choice of framework

provides the structure here. Make sure you refer to lecture notes and methods (all upon Moodle).

(2300 -2500).

Conclusion: Provide a summary of what has taken place. What are the ramifications for nursing jobs practice? (300-400).

The important appraisal of research written by Fitzsimons G Mullan M Wilson L S Conway B Corcoran B Demster M Bet J Stewart C Rafferty S McMahon M McMahon J Mullholland P Hanna L Darkish J (2007) The challenge of patients unmet palliative treatment needs inside the final phases of serious illness Palliative Medicine twenty one, 313-322


The essay aims to critically evaluate a research content, ………. (put the title from the article here) by Fitzsimons et al (2007). The critical evaluation is going to use a recognised exploration framework generally known as Critical Appraisal Skill Program (CASP). Moore and McQuay (2006) establish critical evaluation as a process of looking thoroughly at the analysis in a methodical way to guage its trustworthiness, effectiveness as well as to evaluate its relevance in a particular context. In this job the research is going to concentrate on the importance of mixed technique in a example in the study article. The research used a mixed technique to explore palliative care requirements of noncancerous patients. Data was gathered from people themselves, their particular significant other folks and their scientific team who have are responsible because of their care. To attempt this examine the researchers used various methods and recommended tools such as the Brief Form thirty six (SF 36) and Hospital and Panic and Major depression Questionnaire HADS. The experts found that patients with a noncancerous medical diagnosis health status were showing signs of damage and this led to decreased freedom, social remoteness and burden on their people. These concerns were made worse by not enough appropriate proper care plans. The research also found away that individuals dying by chronic illnesses had various unmet medical needs as a result of ill-equipped treatment teams who also failed to give a holistic way of individual needs. In addition , the study concluded that earlier and effective palliative care procedure was necessary in the last stage of chronic illness.


There are several research frameworks obtainable, which can be used to appraise a nursing study in order to enhance the practice. My own chosen medical framework is usually one referred to as CASP which is commonly used to appraise nursing jobs researches and it is recommended in today's nursing practice. The main reason for selecting CASP construction is that excellent simple critical appraisal checklist that will guide the reader to review and the actual expected problems regarding the reasons of doing the research. Ajetunmobi (2002) defines CASP as a construction which assists health professionals to develop their expertise as this will help to to improve nursing practice. Furthermore, Ajetunmobi (2002) mentioned that using CASP allows a researcher to critique a research study pursuing guided inquiries which cover issues would have to be addressed in a research to boost practice. Possessing a guideline and a list of inquiries to answer allowed me to to examine this theme without heading off subject. This is supported by Mays (2000) who agrees that using CASP framework may help one to analyze important issues that constitutes the validity of the research. About the same description Mays (2002) went on to add the advantages of using CASP organized framework is that it has twelve guided queries which must be answered as you goes along. In addition to this, pursuing CASP framework gives health-care professionals a chance to develop a particular desire to work together to acquire researched proof based understanding and also...

Sources: Barbour RS (2001) Checklists for increasing rigour in qualitative analysis: a case with the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Diary 322 (7294): 1115-1117.

Bazeley P (2009) Editorial: Developing data research in mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research 3(3): 203-207.

Blakemore S (2010) Report shows how patient experience and satisfaction may be measured. Medical Management sixteen (9) several.

Bowling, A. (2002) Research Methods in Health: Looking into Health and Well being Services (2nd Ed). Buckingham: Open School Press.

Bryman, A. (2001) Social Analysis Methods. Oxford: University Press.

Cooper L and Hewison A (2002) Implementing taxation in palliative care: a task research strategy. Journal of Advanced Nursing jobs 39 (4): 360-69.

D'haenen H A H, Boer J A, Willner G (2002) Natural Psychiatry. London: John Wiley and boy.

Fischer COMPUTERTOMOGRAFIE (2006) Qualitative research methods for Psychologist: Introduction through empirical studies. London, uk: Elsevier.

Haigh C (2007) ‘Getting ethics approval', extended range T and Johnson Meters. Research ethics in the actual: issues and solutions intended for health and cultural care. Birmingham: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier.

Hockley J, Dewar B, Watson J (2005) Promoting end-of-life care in nursing homes employing integrated attention pathway for the last stage of life. Log of analysis in medical 10 (2): 135-152.

Holloway, I., Wheeler, S (2002) Qualitative Exploration in Breastfeeding (2nd Ed). Oxford: Blackwell.

Isbister, Watts. (2000) Great communication is an essential part of the educational procedure. British Medical Journal; 320: 7251, 1729.

Johnson R and Onwuegbuzie A (2004) Merged methods analysis: a research

Roberts C (2004) Quantitative and Qualitative exploration: conflicting paradigms or perfect partners. Utilized via http://www.shef.ac.uk//nle 2004/proceedings/symposia/symposium 4 in 10 March 2010.

Mays, D., Pope, C. (2000) Qualitative research in healthcare: examining quality in qualitative analysis. British Medical Journal 320 (7226): 50-52.

Moore A and McQuay H (2006) Clinical trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Public Health Reference unit (2008) Critical Evaluation Skills Programme (CASP). online at: www.phru.nhs.uk/casp.htm: ( utilized 14 Summer 2010).

Schneider Z, Whitehead D, Elliott D (2007) Nursing& midwifery research: strategies and evaluation for evidence-based practice, 3rd edition. Greater london: Mosby Elsevier.

Shamoo A E and Resnik Deb B (2009) Responsible carry out of exploration. 2rd Release. Oxford: oxford University Press.

Wood MJ, Ross-Kerr JC, Brink PJ (2006) Standard steps in Organizing Nursing Research: From Problem to Pitch. 6th copy. Sudbury: Smith and Barlett.

competitive bidding process Research Daily news